Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBigio, Saki
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-01T00:06:13Z
dc.date.available2019-11-01T00:06:13Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.isbn978-956-7421-45-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12580/3807
dc.descriptionThe paper by Christiano and Ikeda in this volume is one of the first efforts to quantify the welfare gains of leverage constraints in a macroeconomic model with a banking sector. Unlike other models their answer is that they can be even more desirable when banks hold little equity and intermediation is depressed. The paper stresses a static force that makes leverage constraints desirable from a second best perspective. This static consideration is the outcome of two frictions: The first is hidden effort on the side of bankers when choosing projects to fund. The second is the presence of incomplete contracts (in the form of limited liability) which prevents depositors from setting contracts that eliminate the hidden effort problem. As a consequence of the lack of optimal contracts times when banks have little equity will be times when optimal contracts cannot be signed and effort is inefficient.
dc.format.pdf
dc.format.extentSección o Parte de un Documento
dc.format.mediump. 257-272
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBanco Central de Chile
dc.relation.ispartofSeries on Central Banking Analysis and Economic Policies no. 19
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.subjectCICLOS ECONÓMICOSes_ES
dc.subjectBANCOSes_ES
dc.subjectMERCADO FINANCIEROes_ES
dc.titleLeverage restrictions in a business cycle model: a comment
dc.type.docArtículo
dc.file.nameBCCh-sbc-v19-p257_272


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile