Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDurlauf, Steven N.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-01T00:01:13Z
dc.date.available2019-11-01T00:01:13Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.isbn956-7421-137
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12580/3684
dc.descriptionThis paper explores the implications of the vast body of studies of cross-country growth determinants for the evaluation of alternative policies. Empirical growth studies have experienced a remarkable flowering in the last fifteen years, and innumerable insights have unquestionably been uncovered concerning similarities and differences in the growth experiences of various groups of countries. This empirical work was stimulated by—and, in turn, has been an essential complement to—the revival of growth theory initiated by the seminal papers of Lucas (1988) and Romer (1986). It constitutes one of the great successes of recent macroeconomic research.
dc.format.pdf
dc.format.extentSección o Parte de un Documento
dc.format.mediump. 163-190
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBanco Central de Chile
dc.relation.ispartofSeries on Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies, no. 6
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/cl/*
dc.subjectDESARROLLO ECONÓMICOes_ES
dc.subjectMACROECONOMÍAes_ES
dc.titlePolicy evaluation and empirical growth research
dc.type.docArtículo
dc.file.nameBCCh-sbc-v06-p163_190


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Chile